My roommate and I were watching the
pilot of the new show Revolution last
week, and she recognized the actress playing the protagonist’s mother as
Elizabeth Mitchell from Lost. Right
away she said, “Oh, damn, I like that actress!” The damn was because she knew, right away, that the mom character was
toast. Parents never survive long when the young hero of an epic adventure is
about to be launched on his or her journey.
Revolution is a dystopian T.V. show,
which is just further proof that YA literature is now in charge of the world,
at least in terms of entertainment. I was a little disappointed in the pilot,
as they seem to have forgotten to have a writer look over the final draft. Hey, remember that time we walked all the
way to Chicago, and then we found the one person we were looking for in the
first building we randomly walked into? Good times! At any rate, Charlie,
the heroine of the story, loses her mother off-camera, after a mysterious power
suck turns off the world (including items with fully-charged batteries, for
some reason). Then, in short order, her father goes and gets himself shot, over
a flash drive cunningly disguised as a sort of space-hippie necklace. And,
viola, Charlie is launched on her adventure. She, as previously mentioned,
walks to Chicago, which takes about one commercial break, and then finds her
uncle. The uncle character should be safe for a while because A) he’s not her
parent and B) he’s Bella’s dad from the Twilight movies. Also, the bad guys
obligingly wait in a single-file line to fight him, which is so thoughtful of
them.
So
why did Charlie’s parents have to die? If you think about it, most of the young
heroes, particularly of adventure/quest stories, are orphans of some sort. Are
all writers just working out their childhood issues with all this patricide and
matricide? No, orphans make for compelling heroes, in more ways than one. I
think Margaret Atwood said it best (she usually does) in her short piece
“Orphan Stories”:
How swiftly the orphans set sail!
No sooner does the starting gun fire than they’re flying! Their yachts are
slimmer, their lines trimmer than ours – than our stodgy barges. They drag no
anchors, they haul no ballast, they toss all baggage overboard, and the one flag
they ever hoist is blank. No wonder they pull out of the bay ahead of the rest,
no wonder they round the cape so briskly!
Two parents means
rules, resentments, issues. There’s more room for the minor stuff: sibling
rivalries, pressure to be good, get good grades,
be nice to Aunt Eunice, be a doctor. One of the only rebellious things I ever did was to go to Mardi
Gras in New Orleans in defiance of my parents’ wishes. They had predicted I
would be assaulted or murdered. I was even more careful than usual on that
trip, mostly because I was bound and determined that my parents would not be
proven right. Also, as a pathetic side note, I was twenty at the time. This is not the
stuff of epic adventure stories. This may also be why I am more about writing
comedy.
And so an alarming number of
parent characters have been slain by writers—dating all the way back to the
Ancient Greeks, who really knew how to mess up a kid’s life. Harry Potter was
just the most recent in a long line of heroes whose own call to adventure
happened on the day their parents died. The tragedy was necessary to make Harry
into the Boy Who Lived, of course. In fact, Dumbledore admits that a Harry who
had not been raised by the Dursleys might have been a very different boy. If
Harry’s parents had lived, there’s certainly text evidence to support the
notion that he would simply have been a mini-James, pantsing the nerdiest
wizard in his year, and learning to transmogrify himself just so he can sneak out
after curfew.
Harry belongs to
the full-orphan category, along with Luke and Annakin Skywalker, and my
personal favorite, Inigo Montoya from The
Princess Bride—and many more. Some of them even have “orphan” right there
in the name, like Little Annie.
But a lot of young heroes lose one
parent. Often the parent who’s left is either symbolically gone, like Katniss’s
ineffectual mom in The Hunger Games,
or too busy being a god (see all of Zeus’s heroic sons).
Real-life parents
can be pretty helpful, but the paper ones are paradoxically heavier—rather than
keeping them to weigh the hero down, or hold her back, writers often cut them
loose. As Atwood observes, orphans don’t have to decide to leave, “For orphans, all roads are
necessary. How can they be kicked out of home? They’re out of home already.”
And as another orphan, Frodo, learned all too well, after you step that first
foot out on the road, away from home, that’s the plot—that’s where the story
happens.
Oh, poor parents! Loved this thoughtful, funny post. I'm forever trying to turn my young sleuths into orphans: workaholism and isolated, far-from-home situations certainly help..
ReplyDeleteThank you! Yep, adventure and mystery stories are hazardous for sure. Workaholics and orphans--sounds very Dickensian!
ReplyDeleteThis is a great post, J.J.. Can't wait to read your book.
ReplyDelete