I have this problem
in which my favorite characters are all bad boys.
Every time I re-read Wuthering Heights, I’m rooting for
Heathcliff. He’s not a good guy. It
shouldn’t really matter how much he loves Cathy. Mr. Rochester, Hamlet—all my
favorite books are filled with jerks whom I can’t help but love.
Maybe it’s that storybook
(or TV or movie) love is interesting because of the conflict, and nobody causes
more trouble than a bad boy. Buffy said it best (in one of my favorite
episodes, season 4’s “Something Blue”)
“I know it's nuts, but part of me believes that
real love and passion have to go hand-in-hand with pain and fighting.”
She then turns and stakes a vamp and wonders
where she got that idea…But for the rest of us, who lead a vamp-dusting free
existence, where does that idea come
from? In my AP class we’ve been talking a lot about the ultimate bad guy:
Milton’s Lucifer.
First of all, poor Milton. I feel bad for the guy. Yes, he achieved immortality with his work. But he was a Puritan who set out to justify the ways of God to man. The fact that the Romantics of the nineteenth century embraced his Satan as an (anti-)hero would likely have upset him. A lot. I would actually argue that we’re still a Romantic era—after centuries cycling through alternating eras of reason and romance, we're probably stuck now. Reason is no longer strictly necessary. Instead, we have Google. Instant gratification (usually emotional) is what we want now.
So if we’re making a
choice of favorite characters with our feelings instead of our brains, it’s bad
boys all the way. It’s just not that much fun to root for the good guy. If you
watch The Vampire Diaries, like I do,
you probably root for bad-brother Damon rather than grim, self-righteous
Stefan (if you’re a fellow TVD fan, are you feeling my pain over this
protracted Professor and The Cure bit? Ugh).
Bad boys are more
compelling for lots of reasons. One: cross them and they’ll get revenge.
Milton’s Lucifer’s first speech promises vengeance, “All
is not lost; the unconquerable will/And
study of revenge, immortal hate/And
courage never to submit or yield”
If you think about
it, a lot of our favorite bad boys have Miltonian DNA. They are often
outcasts—usually by choice. They want their freedom and will do almost anything
to get it. They’re smooth talkers. These characters show up and steal the
show—it happens over and over. The narrator of Gossip Girl in the early days was good-guy Dan. Snore. Bad-boy Chuck Bass
was the character we tuned back in to see.
Maybe it’s the
possibility of redemption that brings us back for more of the bad boys. It’s
more satisfying to watch Chuck struggle to become a better man than it is to
wait for Dan’s inevitable misstep, to be followed by his also-inevitable
self-recrimination-filled moping.
Romantic-era writer
and bad girl Lady Caroline Lamb probably summed up the bad boy’s appeal best
with her famous description of Lord Byron: mad, bad, and dangerous to know. Swoon!
Would I want to
actually deal with one of these mad, bad, dangerous dudes in real life? That’d
be a no. But when it comes time to escape into a book or a show, bring on the
bad boys.
I totally agree! Bad boys always tend to be my favorite characters. They just have a lot more complexity than the good ones. The same goes for villains. While villains aren't always my favorite characters, they are a lot of the time because they have so many more layers to them than heros seem to sometimes. Great post! And I am totally feeling TVD pain, so much.
ReplyDeleteI'm so glad I'm not the only one with TVD. I went from loving every episode this season, to the last couple just wanting the ep to be over. This last one--ugh! Find the cure or don't but let's move on! ;)
Delete